ST weapons are far away better that the star destroyer, they can shot a lot, but the enterprise will not miss anything who enter in his attack range

Photon and Quantum torpedoes, are composed of matter and anti-matter, so, the explosive power of one single torpedo is more than the death star beam
Plus Enterprise can handle a couple of torpedoes without shielding… so…

Shielding, cinetic energy weapons dont do anything against enterprise shielding, even the navigational shielding can handle that fire power

Transporters, Captain of the enterprise can transport 2 torpedoes, one to the engine and one to the bridge
Mobility and chain of command eliminated…
Even they can bring out the fighter crews Heck!
Or all the Star Destroyer Crew to the space…

Warp Speed… do need i explain this?

Phasers, this weapon has the edge on the cutting apart bulky ship contest…

Star Destroyer, RAMMING SPEED
Enterprise, what the hell are they trying, evasive maneuvers… phaser charged at maximum fire at will
Worf (THE GUNNER OF ENTERPRISE-D): Tarjet destroyed sir

We´re Talking about Brute Force of the huns vs a samurai or a ninja… dont make me laugh plz ¬¬

Lets face an M14 against a Barret or an M24, and lets see who would win…..

Greg:

Ok to correct Some Kid on certan things.
1. The large orbs on tob of the control tower that is almost standard on all imperial ships over a certain size are long range sensors, Not sheild generators.
2. Transporter tech does not work as long as ST vessal sheilds are active and wihtout any official source I for one would thing that this would hold true for Imperial sheidling as well since they can shrug off both phisicall entities and radiation.

Actually ST transporters do work with the shields raised, the ships transporter system is aligned with the shields modulation. That being said with the undefined nature of SW weapons laser vrs phaser I wouldnt even post a guess as to the winner if it were energy weapon to energy weapon. The one advantage the ST universe ship would have is there chroniton based torpedoes which were originally developed by the Krinem. The weapons phase in and out of normal time, allowing them to pass through ordinary shields and directly damage a vessel’s hull.

Over all though I would say the star destroyer would win…

A) because it just has more weaponry and
B) last I checked the enterprise wasn’t equipped with a compliment of fighters that could quickly over come a single ships defenses.

Also, to the dude who said that lasers are worthless against the Enterprise, an Imperial Class Star Destroyer also carries ion cannons and strike craft. The ion cannons eat through sheilds and strike craft are too numerous for the enterprise to take them all out.

SW wins

The targeting system of the Abrams allows near point and shoot ability and ranges well over a mile. Factors the targeting system adjusts for are wind speed and drag at various elevations, muzzle drift and and stabilization when firing on the move, distance and possible obstacles, the correolis effect for long range, and others.

The reason a manual loading system is used is because automated reloading systems are notoriously unreliable which is humorous considering the day we live in. An automated reloading system could also interfere with the some of Abram’s damage mitigation systems which seal the ammunition store if the tank is hit. Blow away panels direct the explosion of the damaged ammunition store upwards and away from the crew. This eliminates a major cause of death in the Armored Cavalry.

It is my understanding that the latest generation M1 Abrams is currently tied with the British Challenger as the most advanced tank in the world. Followed by the Russian T-90 and then the French Leclerc or Chinese Type 99

I am going to have to side with Star Trek. Especially since we are talking about the Enterprise D.

Gene Roddenbary used actual math when he created the Star Trek series and by the time The Next Generation was release the math became reasonably standardized.

George Lucas did not have the same Vernes like dedication to the underlying science. Causing people to come after the release of the films to try to standardize the underlying science.

When looking at the underlying science Star Trek wins by a landslide. Weapons that dissolve subatomic bonds. Boson spewing particle accelerators. Antimatter warheads and computers that control point defenses to a level no human could. We are looking at energy level that are truly in the astronomical category.

Star Wars is more mystical than scientific. Lasers sound cool but quickly disperse over long distances. Lasers are essentially columnated light. This light is in a highly ordered state as it travels through space (which is curved and this becomes important even at distances within a solar system, just ask NASA why their probes are so hard to pilot) the ordered energy of the laser will become disordered over space and time.

Phasers function more along the level of particle accelerators which spew beams of subatomic particles. These particles disrupt the vibration of the target atoms and cause the bonds that determine the cohesive nature of the target to dissolve. The matter or energy barrier is torn asunder at the subatomic level to the point that the uncertainty principle of Quantum Mechanics will allow. This functions in a much different way than a laser which relies on the laws of thermodynamics. The laser when it hits an object or barrier is either reflected or the energy dissipates in the form of heat. The laser superheats the object which causes the atoms to vibrate and eventually to break apart. The Star Wars technology is much less sophisticated and efficent than the Star Trek technology.

It is akin to the difference that gunpowder made on Earth, only more so. It would be like a Soldier with the Davy Crockett Mortar firing tactical nukes against a castle with archers. If some Jedi Robin Hood can snipe the soldier before he fires then good for him. Otherwise the castle disappears in a ball of fire.

There are other questions to tackle like Photon(energy packets) Torpedos vs Proton(the positive parts of an atom) Torpedos. Warp drive (space bending transport) versus (hyperdrive) a undiscovered dimension. And others.

I look forward to any replies.